Social Identity Theory Saq

The sit is a surmise that establishes that a person has their stick idiosyncraticity and a sociable identity. By kindly identity I mean the social chemical assembly with which nighone associates. in that respect are a few studies that support this theory from which Im going to describe 2 tajfels (1970), at the arrest of the think over it was shown that the boys chose to maximize their differences over group over maximize their profit. You can see that by doing this the kids fixed to choose their group identity over their social identity. An some other study is Zimbardos prison study. This study shows how both(prenominal) the prisoners and the guards take on the enumeration that has been assigned to them quickly displace their previous identities. It also shows how the prisoners signalise with their in-group and rebel against them. This shows that people peoples behaviour is not only soul but also from our social selves and this studies help me prove that we loo k at a social identity in addition to our individual one. In the contrary just like any other theory there are strengths and limitation.

The limitations of this theory are that The depend upon predicts that group trial will lead to reduced fellowship with the group, but this has been disproven this states thats this theory is not true interbreed culturally in collectivist cultures.. There is a study by subgenus Chen et al. (1998) that shows that students in USA evaluated the out-group more favorably if they succeeded and their in-group didnt. this was shown opposite to what Chinese students would do. Altho ugh SIT does accurately predict in-group fa! voritism (or lack of) in individualist cultures, it does not always do so in collectivist cultures.If you want to get a full essay, pasture it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper