Literal Intelligence Collection

Literal Intelligence assembling interior(a) Intelligence and the NSA wireless mediate course Intelligence Collection Sources and Chall(a)enges February 13, 2012 In the aftermath of 9/11 the watchword club (IC) felt pressure from all directions. Employees of the IC, sexual relation, and the general habitual wanted questions answered as to why our nation didnt make let expose an polish was imminent. This stroke of news show agency ca workd a shake up within the accurate IC, leading to al about(prenominal) future stirs. angiotensin converting enzyme such change was in communications intelligence (COMINT) collection. fit in to cummings (2006), electric chair George W. supply said that he authorized NSA to lay off the worldwide communications of people with know links to al Qaeda and connect terrorist organizations in the weeks following the September eleventh terrorist attacks (p. 6). The Presidents decision had legion(predicate) repercussions. I will discuss t he parameters of the decision, the hustlingness issues associated with it that lead to such controversy, and the impact it had on national intelligence and the NSA.What led to this forceful decision by the U. S. President? The fall in States was blind-sighted in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack which resulted in the death of 2,977 innocent Americans. This was the largest attack in the history of the U. S. on our soil and although the signs were in that respect for the intelligence community to see, it was mistakenly non stick together. Much of the attack originate in from communications between terrorist or those connected and working with terrorist within our Country, and this was unacceptable.In order to reason against such communications, according to Lichtblau & type Aereamp Risen (2005), Under a presidential order sign-language(a) in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, pe rhaps thousands, of people wrong the United States without warrants over the past trine years in an effort to racetrack possible dirty numbers relate to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor whole internal communications.The sole economic consumption of the NSA chopine was to safeguard our national earnest in a more than expansive, efficacious manner. The center on law and auspices (2007) states this requirement to demonstrate all of the square and procedural elements of FISA to the Attorney Generals satisfaction originally any watch can begin, would fatally impair the Presidents ability to carry out his constitutional responsibility to collect unlike intelligence to protect our Nation from attack (p. 9).Any implementation involving citizens privacy is insure to draw controversy, and the root of the line of work with this program was a heed issue. The President, DCI, and the music director of the NSA should carry informed the head of the Senate Select and congressional backsliding committees with a more in depth understanding of the changes and the seclusion. A intention should oblige been in come to palm with leaks to the public of the changes, and a more elaborate description of the amendment to the policy should have been created and unplowed under lock and key.Intelligence collection involves many activities that citizens (lacking all of the facts), may deem unconstitutional. The problem with this is most of the date the facts are non available to the general population, media, and even sealed members of the Congressional oversight committees, for fear of an motion leak. Much of what the IC does must persist secret, at least until the aftermath (which could be years later). In regards to the topic at hand, authorization of warrantless wireless intercept by the NSA, the main problem arose due to management failures in the implementation of such a controversial topic.The center on law and security (2007) states, Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, yet rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence seizure of any oversight (p. 10). The Congressional oversight committees serve as a checks and equipoise to the IC and the President informed the heads of the committees (Gang of eighter) of his think to authorize wireless intercepts on Americans. Cummings (2006) states, the executive branch had limited its briefings of the legislative branch to the Gang of eighter from Decatur.They further maintain that the executive branch had prohibited them from manduction any schooling about the program with congressional colleagues (p. 7). In the aftermath, it seems the Gang of Eight did not understand the necessity of secrecy behind this information. The President should have explained the argumentation behind the secrecy and why the information was limited to the Gang of Eight. If the Gang of Eig ht understood the parameters and restrictions in place, they could better defend the plan when future problems arose. Preparations hould have been in place for dealing with the public if and when the time came that the media caught wind of the wireless intercept. At any(prenominal) point the President should expect that the public would have to be addressed with some details defending his actions. There should have been regulations in place, describing the limits the NSA still had to endure when it came to U. S. citizens. When reports came out in 2005, at that place was much astonishment as to what exactly the President had authorized, and if there were limits in place for the NSA. A failure to properly address the issue allowed the media to actuate wild with stories, further outraging critics.Silence and secrecy solely added to the problem of dis leave of the IC. In preparation, President Bush should have had a dilate description of the amendment to the policy, with restrictio ns still in place for the NSA. This policy should have been dated at the time it went into effect, signed by the President, the DCI, the Director of NSA and the Gang of Eight and kept in the possession of the Director of the NSA. Having a signed document would serve the future shoot for of showing there was knowledge of the parameters of the revise policy.If this policy had to become public (open source) at some point, it would hopefully show that counseling had made an organized effort of implementing change and involved as many officials as possible under the current circumstances. The National Security Agency (NSA) has the task of defend U. S. national security systems through the use of signal intelligence (SIGINT), to include COMINT. front to the President giving authorization to warrantless domestic eavesdropping following 9/11, the NSA had to obtain a court approved warrant in order to eavesdrop on a U.S. citizens communications, otherwise known as a FISA (Foreign Intell igence Surveillance Act) warrant. According to the center on law and security (2007) FISA warrants require probable cause to shady that an individual is acting either for a contrary power (including terrorist organizations) or as an agent of a foreign power, a target (a cell phone, a computer, a BlackBerry, or a landline phone, for example), and that foreign intelligence be a profound purpose of the warrant (p. ). NSA is no exotic to negative public perception regarding their unconstitutional practices. This wireless intercept program put the agencys written report at stake once again. Reports of the NSA having access to most Americans phone records detail their calls and communications is cause for concern for critics. imputable to a lack of proper implementation, notifications and fortune for oversight, the NSA and the IC has to climb another uphill battle to win back the trust of Americans.Dilanian (2011) states, U. S. intelligence officials insist that the new surveillan ce powers have been crucial to stopping terrorist plots. Hopefully, some of the more recent successes in the community can erase the impact of failures and the intelligence community can improve their reputation once again. References Cummings, Alfred (2006). Statutory procedures under which Congress is to be informed of U. S. intelligence activities, including surreptitious actions NSA domestic surveillance.Congressional Research Service Dilanian, sight (2011). 9/11, ten years after, more surveillance A legacy of watchful eyes The government eavesdrops on U. S. citizens as never before. Los Angeles Times Aug 30, 2011. Tuesday Home Edition. Lichtblau, E. &amp Risen, J. (2005). Bush lets U. S. spy on callers without courts. The New York Times, Dec 16, 2005. doi 942423341 The sum of money on Law and Security at the NYU school of Law (2007). The NSA wiretapping program. For The Record, 1(Jan) 1-16.