No Universal Definition of Human Rights Essay -- Argumentative Persuas

In the minds of many mint mercifulkind rights atomic number 18 defined as a set of governmental Dos and Donts that protect people from their governments in terms of the freedom of speech, assembly, etc. without infringement. Of course, most people would keep that these be fundamental rights and merit to be upheld, however many feel that there are a set of universal human rights that evict be used to see to it the freedom of whole people around the world. One much(prenominal) document, the frequent Declaration of Human Rights written by the United Nations, claims to be the popular standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. While I agree with most of the points made in the declaration, I simply do not believe that the human race is homogenous enough for a genius piece of paper to encompass human rights issues for all cultures and types of people, and I project this very assumption to be problematic.I believe that human rights are relative to every culture and/or nation, and should be left to the people to decide. I think that on the issue of human rights, people willing not go wrong if they are allowed a fair fabrication for voicing their opinions and an equal manner in making decisions. Cruel and out-of-the-way punishment from a Western point-of-view may be an African people using neck braces to elongate the necks of women, whereas others may think the comparable of the death penalty in use in the United States. My personalised experience of moving from Iran to the United States and witnessing many different atrocities in both(prenominal) cultures has led me to this view. For instance, in Iran there is no freedom of speech or assembly and any resistance to the government is smashed by handcuffs or oftentimes death. This is clearly a violation of human rights by most people, and if... ...ny the ownership of snobby land, and many people in those countries are happy with that. Many of these people believe that private ownersh ip is the al-Qaida for inequality in a society. They would not consider lack of private property a human rights violation. Again, the Universal Declaration is attempting to umbrella all nations and people while in reality contradicting itself. Overall, from my own experiences I shake up come to the personal conclusion that it is impossible to create a dogma that addresses human rights for every culture and nation in the world. In my opinion, human rights are a set of rights determined by people of idiosyncratic nations or cultures for the purpose of living best in society. These rights cannot be pre-determined nor can they be forced upon people in the form of a list, such as is attempted by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.