1
st
Argument
Target Claim: that the ancient man in the flatbed below couldnt (with indisputablety) spend a penny
heard the boy wawl Im going to tear you.
1.The fair sex across the street saw the stabbing through and through the last two cars of the El.
2. The sh pop out was heard wiz turn before the stabbing.
3. The El takes 10-12 seconds to pass a given point, much(prenominal) as the old mans window.
So, 4., The El was going by at the time of the shout. (1, 2, 3)
5. The El is really loud when it goes by.
6. The window to the old mans apartment was open
So, 7., the old man would have heard the shout against the background of the really
loud El (4, 5, 6)
8 We cant be certain of what we hear when there is other, loud, noise.
So, 9., the old man couldnt have (with certainty) have heard the boy shout (7, 8)
2
nd
Argument
Target Claim: that the womanhood living across the tracks couldnt (with certainty) have
seen the boy stab his father.
1. The woman had marks on her nose.
2. Such marks can only when be made by provide.
So, 3., the woman wears glasses. (1, 2)
4. No one wears glasses to bed.
5. The woman was in bed when she witnessed the killing.
So, 6.
, she was not vesture her glasses at the time she witnessed the killing. (3, 4, 5)
7. People who wear glasses usually (sunglasses would be an exception) have scurvy
eyesight without glasses.
So, 8., the womans eyesight was poor when she witnessed the killing. (6, 7)
9. The killing was witnessed under difficult circumstances: it was night, and a aim was
passing by.
10. The killing was witnesses only very shortly the lights went out immediately.
11. Testimony from eye-witnesses who have poor eyesight, and witness the event only
briefly and under difficult circumstances is dubious.
So, 12., the womans testimony that she saw the boy stab his father is dubious. (8, 9,
10, 11)If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment