Refining Personal Philosophies

One of the natures of philosophy as I have notice in the course is that one can not guess at a or an estimate from a noncompetitive point of view . In philosophy , on that point is ever so more than one way of viewing an idea or a concept and to any idea there is ever so a counter idea that either disposes or chall(a)enges the antecedent idea or that makes a modification of it . Therefore , philosophical discussions atomic number 18 open discussions with several differing views ab prohibited the same idea . Hence there is no room for dogmatism or dominance of ideaAt the beginning of the course , I must get that I had a rather monopolistic view . I have always believed that there are some parametric quantitys that are not worth it . I was of the opinion that any sensible being should believe some things and that these things are not enigmatical . I believed that there are some ideas that should not be challenged as there is nothing to challenge about them . For me , we all know that these ideas are either true or absurd and that settles it . I was soon to discover how wrong I was with my theoryAs the semester went on , we had classes where I was stunned at the views of some of my colleagues . I estimation to myself How could someone reason like this To my utmost surprise , the ideas that I thought no sane human being depart challenged were being challenged by my view own mates . It was a new world of experience that changed my perspective to a conduct of things and makes me appreciate philosophy more . One of such discussions we had in the course that changed my view was the idea of freewillI had always thought that the particular that divinity fudge is a perfect being that is infinitely unattackable and can not be blamed for anything is not problematic .

It was therefore a surprise to me when issues like the fairness of immortal was raised and his actions were criticized . I initially thought that it was a soaked idea to raise but as the discussions continued , I began to visit some sense in what was being verbalize . I learnt to understand what these ideas were aspect while asking myself is there sense in what is being saidThe course and the discussions we had made me see the issue of freewill from another perspective and instead of out rightly refuting the argument , I learnt to understand what the argument was saying and then look if it was plausible . For instance , there was the argument that if the nature of divinity fudge is that He is an all-powerful and an all-knowing God who is present everywhere , even inside his head , his every thought or action is known to that same God , then man can not do anything without his companionship . If this is so , then his love for man should be move as he punishes man for doing wrong . The question asked...If you deprivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper