The Analytical Approach by Eisner

The value of Eisner's approach is that he analyzes the concept of government activitys over time to show first the antithetic regimes that came into being in each era, the reason why these regimes developed, and the institutional transports that took place over time. This allows for an analysis of the modern regime that takes into composition what it inherited in terms of institutions, policies, and processes and for a degree of extrapolation from the current regime to the next. Once the forces that go into shaping a regime be understood, it is possible to assess the development of those forces in the lay out to understand what the effect may be in the future.

Eisner explains the rootage of a regime when he writes,

A regime emerges when bare-assed regulatory policies are initiated in several regulatory impression areas (e.g., finance, agriculture, and industrial relations) and are combined with significant institutional changes. The insurance policy initiatives commonly display a set of related goals which transcends the special problems of a given industry. Moreover, the new administrative procedures often construct a common role for economic interests in the interpretation and implementation of a policy (Eisner 3).

Eisner points out that this represents a doggedness which in turn reflects the power of prevailing political-economic theories and administrative clear up doctrines.

Eisner points out the value of regime analy

Meier calls for a rational drug policy that avoids many of these problems and others caused by our present policy, and he is explicit about what such a policy would entail:

2) Individuals might support the current policies because they are interested in the redistri entirelyion of value, and this is a way to show that one's values are superior.

This idea also is not easily dislodged, demarcation as it is with other social concerns and with the individual's sense of his or her make morality.

Perhaps the one way to make a change in policy is to overcome the strong moral opprobrium attached to drug use and to reduce the "sin" formula of the problem while highlighting the benefits to society of reducing drug-related crime. This is in all likelihood to fail as well for one reason--the public is confident(p) that only an all-out war on drugs may involve junior people away from drugs. What adults do is one thing, but as long as so many young people are drawn to drugs, a change in policy is unlikely.

Meier is also explicit that such a policy will not likely be adopted. In order to attempt to get the policy adopted, we must address not only the policy initiatives noted above but the reasons why Meier believes there will be no change in policy, at least not toward a more rational system:

Eisner, Marc Allen. Regulatory Politics in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!