Criminological Theory

He advocated a bid that punishment should be swift, sealed, and proportional to the iniquity. He also advocated the abolishment of both corporal and capital punishment, a revolutionary inclination in his time. His work was promoted by Bentham, particularly in his daybook An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Beccaria and Bentham believed that people committed horrors when they believed that the chance of rewards to them would be greater than the likelihood of punishment (Hollin, 2004, 2). It was the pain/ frolic invite of human behavior: that humans sought to gain pleasure and avoid pain. These men believed that people acted on the principle of still will: they made a choice of what behaviors to indulge in and therefore should get together the consequences if caught in criminal acts. The emphasis on human-centered rationality led these theorists to the position that perpetrators of crimes should be held personally responsible for their actions and punished according to the severity of the crime (Juvenile, 2005, 71). under(a) these circumstances, criminal law must match the needs of the soulfulness to the needs of indian lodge as a whole, with neither privation a crime to be committed (Hollin, 2004, 2). This is achieved by the society making the punishment for committing a crime harsh fair to middling that no one will want to take the venture of engaging in criminal behavior and being caught.

chthonic these conditions, Bentham believed that p

http://wwwsagepub.com/Martin%20Chapter%203%20Juvenile%20

Classical theory saw a resurgence in the late twentieth century in the United States, when its central values were employ to the effort to crackdown on juvenile delinquency and crime (Juvenile, 2005, 73). The ism which formed the basis of the American criminal justice remains switched away from trying to rehabilitate offenders and turned again towards punishment, incapacitation and deterrence. Since guileless theory is based on the notion that people set about free will and argon rational, it is assumed that they know what they are doing and the risks they are taking when they break the law and therefore should suffer the consequences.

Any mitigating social circumstances, such as family situation, economic harm etc., are considered secondary to the individual's decision to break the law.

If the punishment is more and more harsher as the level of the crime increases, so that the cost of the crime always outweighs the benefits, then punishment can act as a deterrent (Hollin, 2004, 2; Juvenile, 2005, 71-72).

http://www.criminology.su.edu/crimtheory/week3.tm

Brief check up on of sociological explanation of crime. ND. Retrieved Nov. 8, 2005 from

The neo Greco-Roman theory endorses most of the Hellenic theory, with two exceptions: a rejection of the rigidity of the classical system of punishment, and a degree of subjectivity (discretion) when assessing criminal responsibility (Brief, 2001). A distinction feature of the neoclassical system is the plea bargain, which gives the prosecution and demurral an opportunity to make a deal in which the impeach will plead guilty in return for certain considerations such as a reduced sentence or charge on a lesser crime. Like classical theory, neoclassical theory assumes that the accused calculated the risks before committing the crime and is therefore willing to accept the punishment.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!